CO129-607-6 Police Department- Indian Section 11-1-1948 - 7-4-1949 — Page 5

See

introduced from

1.1.46.

discretion of

and

the

it is presumably 5 H.K. Govt. to

cases

the benefit of it in these

(31)(42)

(47)

within the

1946, 1447

with hold

file.

So far

since

in HK service.

the

1.1.47 revisie in

these ex-policemer

on

1.1.48.

were

in

cerned,

fact

(the date of

final approval of the Salaries Commerman's

recommendations)

dations) it might be held that

entated

to retrospective benefit- prouided by the first sentence

yes gell they

ave

para 194 of the Salaris Commmersion Report

a

copy of which I have placed opposite). Again however it is clearly within the Governors with hold benefit since the

dication

Salaries Camussion recommendation

Pas

Zegal force

and

in

any

Casse

t is

permissive in from and does not confer

right.

Mr Fawelough will perhaps comment

the point

about the onussion in Police

Pension Regulations of provision for abolition factor,

in

para 4

to which

reference is made of ench II to (5). I think the

explanation offered by Hong Kong is

with which we would

reasonable

agree

I agree JE King

Bradford

6/10